2008 Lancer Dyno ( Post your Numbers Here )

Discussion in '8G Lancer - General Information' started by RALLIART, Aug 28, 2007.

  1. RALLIART

    RALLIART Well-Known Member

    Please have some proof like i do, dont just post numbers.

    Well i dynoed my car today, its a cvt, it was really hard to get resanable numbers due to CVT tranny. mine look like this.



    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. WildBill

    WildBill Well-Known Member

    Dang dude...the CVT really sapped the HP ratings...

    Bill
     
  3. RALLIART

    RALLIART Well-Known Member

    yeah man cvt sucks monkey balls
     
  4. bras_33

    bras_33 Well-Known Member

    And I can quote you on that Jake?!

    Kinda disappointing after the mods (axle back, pulley and intake) you put on. If it was tuned correctly there may be a difference. This is whp/wtq right?
     
  5. kinkbmxrydr

    kinkbmxrydr Guest

    wow all those mods and you get that as results.


    man...... :(
     
  6. Redline1

    Redline1 Well-Known Member

    im in for a tranny swap because i got the cvt to. i dont think it really helps any, they say its suppose to save gas.
     
  7. RALLIART

    RALLIART Well-Known Member

    i had no choice i needed a car that day, dealer told me it would have been a 4 week wait for a 5sp to come on a lot. i said screw it.
     
  8. gatzaraki

    gatzaraki Well-Known Member

    cvt

    man, cvt really sucks i'm glad i drive a stick :lol:
     
  9. SeRious08

    SeRious08 Well-Known Member

    Jake, if you want to pull my dyno sheet from EvoM, you can.
     
  10. JDM FLOW

    JDM FLOW Well-Known Member

    Hopefully their will be a turbo that satisfies our needs of more hp!
     
  11. spunx021

    spunx021 Well-Known Member

    ouch, those numbers look painful, even with some bolt on mods that's all we can get? :x :x
     
  12. SeRious08

    SeRious08 Well-Known Member

    What were you guys expecting??!!

    Think about it. 152 crank hp - 20% drivetrain lost = 121.6 whp.

    With a muffler and intake you will see about 123-126 whp. Right where Jake is at.

    Get over it. Our cars are heavy and slow.
     
  13. Evolve

    Evolve Well-Known Member

    lmao. people are allowed to be disapointed.
     
  14. SeRious08

    SeRious08 Well-Known Member


    Only those that didn't do research and expect "magic" hp numbers.
     
  15. WillieetheOne

    WillieetheOne Well-Known Member

    Yeah i feel you Jake. Our car was rear ended and once we had been told it was a write off we had only 48 hours to find a new car. I wanted the manual, but the miss and daughter cant and wont learn stick they are to afraid of it i guess. The Salesguy mentioned the CVT and by the soumd of it at the time it sounded cats ass always in the power zone lo lag shit it sounded better than a standard but nooooooo. it sure as hell isnt. Thanks for the proof. CVT isnt for everyone lol i love the torque lol give me manual please.